However it is recognised that for some programmes it is sometimes necessary to break anonymity but this should occur only when absolutely necessary and appropriate. Regulations require students to be assessed in the year they study a module, therefore dissertations should still be submitted as required in September or appropriate deadline date. The mark awarded for a re-taken examination shall, unless there are extenuating circumstances deemed acceptable by the Board of Examiners, be subject to a penalty. In this section Find your course Applying Fees and funding International students Studying abroad For parents and supporters Schools and colleges Find your why Central London campus Prospectuses and brochures Sign up for more information A degree with added value. As above For Masters Degrees:
Finalist classifications will be calculated by the Assessments Manager and confirmed in liaison with the Chair of the Board of Examiners. As part of their programme of study, a student may attend and be assessed for a module maximum of 30 credits at one level , taught at another School or Institute of the University of London, in the place of a module option at Goldsmiths. The Enrolments and Records Team will send appropriate enrolment information to continuing students. This arrangement is subject to the requirements of the Programme Regulations and the agreement of the Head of Department or authorised tutor. Represents the overall achievement of the appropriate learning outcomes to a threshold level.
The following are the agreed College-wide grading criteria for undergraduate degrees assessed under the credit framework: Back Giving Home Why support the College? Continuing students, those registered on or before Septemberwill be able to withdraw from assessment in late summer, providing they inform Assessments in writing by the deadline notified to them. Departments should still continue to list specific grading criteria in each generic grading band in order to allow an assessment of the level of coirsework of the appropriate learning outcomes.
A submission that does not even attempt to address the specified learning outcomes shall be deemed a non valid attempt and module must be re-sat.
Students registering for a programme of study for the first time from Septemberwill be required to retake in late summer if directed to do so by the Board of Examiners. Represents a significant overall failure to achieve the appropriate learning outcomes shall be deemed a valid attempt and must be resat unless all three permitted attempts have been used.
View all undergraduate courses for News Making decisions in space Newly published research by Royal Holloway’s Department of Psychology shows how people make decisions in zero gravity.
Assessment methods may include seen or unseen written examinations, coursework, oral examinations viva voce psyhology, practical examinations, presentations, portfolios, exhibitions, performances, professional practice.
Student intranet Staff intranet. Comment on this page Did you find the information you were looking for? The practice of anonymity is an important part of the maintenance of integrity and fairness of the marking system.
Students permitted to defer assessment or to re-enter in late summer, will be informed by the Assessments Manager.
More in this section Information for current students. For instance, you may not repeat substantially the same material in a formal written examination or in a dissertation if it has already formed part of an essay submitted for assessment. Is there a broken link or content that needs updating? See paragraph regarding compensation of failed modules and appendix 5 for criteria to be met to allow compensation.
Did you find the information you were looking for? Other forms of assessment are oral examinations viva vocepractical or performance examinations, presentation, studio presentation exhibition and professional practice.
This provides an audit trail and facilitates amendments on to the student record system, it also ensures the integrity of the data and that all changes are formally communicated to students. Applications which request non-standard adjustments will be referred to the Departmental Senior Tutor to recommend whether or not the requested assessment adjustments are academically necessary, the request and recommendation will then be considered by a panel before referral to psycholgoy Pro-Warden to determine if they are reasonable and can be provided.
3. Assessment Processes
As part of their programme of study, a student may attend and be assessed for a module maximum of 30 credits at one leveltaught at another School or Institute of the University of London, in the place of a module option at Psuchology.
3. Assessment Processes | Goldsmiths, University of London
This should also include any first draft mark sheets that contribute to the mark actually given, so that in the case of an appeal, there will be a complete audit trail available. The same material may not for instance, be repeated substantially in a formal written examination or in a dissertation if it has already formed part of an essay submitted for assessment.
Completed scripts will be held by the Assessments Team to be collected by Departments for marking at the earliest possible time. Represents the overall achievement of the appropriate learning outcomes to an outstanding level. Students with a disability who have assessment reasonable adjustments will be accommodated at Goldsmiths for written examinations, where possible and practical.
Represents the overall achievement of the appropriate learning outcomes to a very good psjchology. Appeals cannot be re-opened once a decision has been reached.
Research institutes and centres.