Consistency in style and formatting of a thesis is essential. Ethics Approval where applicable and copyright releases from publications must be included here. All textual material including the abstract, acknowledgments, and other preliminary material must have 1. Unacceptable to go forward to defense Unacceptable: The Chair communicates the positive decision to the candidate.
The pages of preliminary material acknowledgment, table of contents, etc. We strongly recommended that authors use a thesis template. Continued Access to Scholarship Western You will be able to view your thesis on Scholarship Western following its publication. Ensuring that requests and approvals for remote examination are made in a timely manner Ensuring remote attendance at public lectures wherever possible Hosting a conferencing solution in an appropriate environment that adequately supports the needs of the candidate and examiners. A title page is generated and attached to the front of a thesis after it is uploaded to Scholarship Western. Two Program Examiners Role:
If the candidate feels a confidentiality agreement is required, the candidate must ensure that each Examiner’s signed agreement is delivered to the School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies along with the Doctoral Thesis Examination Request Form.
For example, the following sgpa could be used for a thesis studying fuzzy relational modeling:.
Must have appropriate SGPS membership Must attend the Public Lecture No more than one Program Examiner may be from the candidate’s Thesis Supervisory Committee Must not uwp had significant involvement in the development of the thesis nor interest in the outcome.
Upon final approved submission, the work is published to the Scholarship Western ETD repository, pending any requests for a delay of publication.
The thesis must indicate in what respects the investigation has increased knowledge of the subject. Annotate appropriately coloured charts, figures, graphs or maps, since the colours will reproduce in indistinguishable shades of grey on microfiche. The criteria that determine whether an article is suitable for publication are not identical to the academic requirements for a thesis.
Doctoral Thesis Library and Archives Canada Theses Non-Exclusive License Receiving Final Approval for Publication After your revised work is uploaded to Scholarship Western, please contact your final approver s to request they review the work and ensure all revisions have been made appropriately prior to publication.
SGPS has allowed certain programs to waive this requirement.
These margins apply equally to all illustrative material: Candidates are required to submit the following to the School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies before publication can occur: Once the thesis is published, you have officially completed the thesis requirement for your degree.
Your thesis with recommended changes completed Any supplemental content you wish to append to your thesis prior to publication To upload your final submission: A title page is generated and attached to the front of a thesis after it is uploaded submlssion Scholarship Western.
Connecting materials to provide logical bridges between the different chapters Appendices This section to contain details of methodology, tabulated data, and other pertinent data not provided in detail in previous chapters. Co-authors or collaborators of any component of the thesis may not serve as Sps.
Ask your supervisory team for guidance concerning the questions that your examiners are likely to ask. It is explained that the examiners will know that the Supervisor has not signed off.
You can continue to use Scholarship Western with access to any collections, including the ETD collection. The thesis Supervisor sSupervisory committee or the thesos alone may also initiate this process. An examiner’s preliminary judgment of acceptability is provisional.
If the student still chooses to submit without supervisor approval: The Chair presides over the Thesis Examination.
Where the Re-Submission Hearing Committee agrees that the candidate should be given the opportunity to revise the thesis to bring it to the acceptable scholarly standard for examination, the submiesion first establishes a new Thesis Examination date, svps earlier than six weeks after the date of the originally scheduled examination.
A faculty member asked to examine a thesis should declare possible sources of conflict. Thus, if possible, the title should include key words that link the thesis to literature on its topic. Formatting Overall, it is important to submit a thesis that has a consistent and readable appearance.
Krystyna Locke Thesis and Membership Coordinator. If the reason concerns academic integrity, then the appropriate procedures are followed according to University policy www. There are two possible outcomes that the examiners may consider: Students should be conscious of the implications of electronic publication in the digital context: The expected content of an abstract varies among disciplines, but all abstracts can be expected to include the following:.
The Thesis Examination may be postponed or cancelled if any step in the examination process is not completed on schedule e. No later than three weeks before the date of the Thesis Examination, the Master’s candidate submits a final draft of the thesis for preliminary examination. Publication or acceptance for publication of research results before presentation of the thesis in no way supersedes the University’s evaluation and judgment of the work during the thesis examination process.
The involvement of an Examiner with the candidate or Supervisor in a personal capacity, such as: At the end of the Abstract should appear a list of keywords.